"Lazy" Is Not What They Are

I need to tell you about the people I work with every day. Someone needs to correct the record.

The loudest voices in the AI music debate love one word: Lazy. They claim that people using AI are cutting corners, skipping the craft, and gaming the system. They paint a caricature of a scammer pressing a button and collecting royalty checks while "real" musicians suffer.

I talk to these creators every single day. I read their emails. I watch them build in our community. And I can tell you with absolute certainty: Lazy is not what they are.

The Reality of the Lab

I have a member right now who is mapping out complex chord progressions for an entire song—every measure, every transition—and feeding those into a style prompt to force the AI to follow his harmonic vision. Not the AI’s idea of what the song should sound like. His. If you think writing a full chord chart and then wrestling a model into submission sounds like "cheating," you’ve never actually tried it. That isn't automation. That’s direction. That’s composition.

I have a guitarist who records his own tracks—real fingers on real strings—and uses AI to generate the drum and bass sections he can't produce himself. He isn’t "replacing" a rhythm section; he’s filling a gap that used to require a $500-a-day studio budget he doesn't have.

I have members deep in the weeds of stem separation—dissecting AI-generated tracks into individual parts so they can keep what works and replace the rest with their own live recordings. They aren't accepting an output; they are rebuilding it from the inside out.

The Studio You Never Had

Then there are the lyricists. These are people who have poured their hearts onto paper for decades and are finally hearing those words as finished songs. Real lyrics about real loss and real life.

One of our members told me her songs now make people cry. Not because the AI wrote something moving—the AI didn't write a single word—but because she did. The AI just gave her the studio she was denied for forty years.

AI didn’t make them musicians. They were already musicians. AI made them producers.

The Bridge vs. The Crutch

There is a massive difference between using a tool as a crutch and using a tool as a bridge.

  • A crutch replaces the work.

  • A bridge gets you to work you couldn't reach before.

Every single person in our community is building a bridge. They aren't looking for a shortcut; they are looking for a way to manifest their creativity without being held hostage by a $50,000 entry fee.

So, the next time someone tells you that AI musicians are taking the "easy way out," ask them if they've ever:

  • Spent three hours tweaking a prompt word-by-word until the output finally matched the sound in their head.

  • Run fifteen iterations of a track to find the one that captures the right emotional "pocket."

  • Split stems, loaded them into a DAW, replaced the drum track, re-mixed the master, and handled their own distribution—all without a label, a manager, or an engineer.

That isn’t "pressing a button." That’s engineering.

Lazy is not what they are.

- Josh


The AI Music Library is where serious creators learn these workflows. 100+ members worldwide. One price, lifetime access, new content every other Wednesday. jgbeatslab.com/ai-music-library

Next
Next

The PRO Registration Mistake That Kills Your Royalties